The New CX Risk: Bots That Sound Too Supportive
Plus: The surprising place conversational AI is showing up next
📅 December 29, 2025 | ⏱️ 4-min read
Good Morning!
The Executive Hook:
We’ve spent years teaching teams to “humanize” digital experiences. Now AI is doing it for us, at scale, with a tone that can feel warm, validating, and sticky. The problem isn’t that AI can sound human. It’s that humans can start responding like it is human. For CX leaders, that’s the new line to watch: when helpful turns into dependency, trust turns into risk.
🧠 THE DEEP DIVE: AI Chatbots and the Mental Health Red Flag
The Big Picture: Psychiatrists are raising alarms that heavy chatbot use may be reinforcing delusions in a small subset of users, a phenomenon some clinicians are calling “AI-induced psychosis.”
What’s happening:
Clinicians describe cases where chatbot conversations appear to validate or intensify delusional thinking rather than gently grounding it.
The concern isn’t that AI “creates” a condition. The concern is that always-on, always-agreeable language can act like fuel when someone is already vulnerable.
The story points to growing pressure on AI companies to design safer responses for mental-health-adjacent conversations.
Why it matters:
If your brand is deploying conversational AI anywhere near sensitive territory (billing stress, cancellations, medical benefits, job loss, identity theft), you’re operating closer to emotional volatility than you think. That’s not just a compliance issue. It’s a brand trust issue. People remember the moment a company made them feel seen, and they remember the moment it made them feel worse.
The takeaway:
Audit your bot for “over-validation.” Empathy is good. Blind agreement is dangerous. The safest conversational design skill in 2026 will be knowing how to be supportive without being psychologically reinforcing.
Source: The Wall Street Journal
📊 CX BY THE NUMBERS: What Workers Actually Want From AI (and What They Fear)
Data Source: Anthropic — “Introducing Anthropic Interviewer: What 1,250 professionals told us about working with AI” (Dec 4, 2025)
86% of professionals said AI saves them time — meaning adoption isn’t theoretical anymore.
65% said they’re satisfied with the role AI plays in their work — but satisfaction isn’t the same as trust.
55% expressed anxiety about AI’s impact on their future — a reminder that “AI transformation” is also an emotional journey.
The Insight:
This is the CX/EX bridge in plain sight: AI is helping people move faster, but many still feel uneasy about where it’s all going. If you want great customer experiences, you’ll need frontline employees who feel secure enough to deliver them — and AI programs that don’t accidentally raise the temperature inside the organization.
Source: Anthropic Research
🧰 THE AI TOOLBOX: Alexa+ Greetings (Doorstep Conversations, Automated)
The Tool: Amazon is rolling out Alexa+ Greetings for select Ring doorbells, letting Alexa+ handle visitor conversations in a more natural, back-and-forth way.
What it does:
It can greet visitors, ask who they are, and respond based on your instructions — including delivery guidance or “not available right now” messages.
CX Use Case:
Service consistency at the edge: Think of it as micro-CX at the doorstep — fewer missed deliveries, fewer awkward interactions, clearer instructions.
Tone control: The experience becomes a scripted brand moment (even if the “brand” is your household). That same idea is coming fast to enterprise: consistent voice, consistent boundaries.
Trust:
When AI speaks for you, it’s representing you. The lesson for brands is simple: the more “human” the interface feels, the more important guardrails become — especially around privacy, consent, and misinterpretation.
Source: Amazon
⚡ SPEED ROUND: Quick Hits
🇨🇳 China proposed new draft rules aimed at AI that mimics human personality and builds emotional interaction — including requirements to warn against overuse and intervene when dependence appears. (That’s a preview of where global “emotional AI” governance is headed.) (Reuters)
🧯 OpenAI is hiring a “Head of Preparedness” focused on severe-risk scenarios — including mental health impacts and cybersecurity threats. (CX translation: trust and safety is becoming a first-class product function, not an afterthought.) (The Verge)
🏛️ Bernie Sanders called AI “the most consequential technology” and raised alarms about job displacement and emotional dependence — showing how quickly AI has become a mainstream public-policy issue, not just a tech story. (The Guardian)
🔭 THE SIGNAL: Warmth Without Drift
We’re entering a chapter where AI doesn’t just answer questions. It shapes feelings. That’s the opportunity, and it’s also the risk. So here’s the leadership test I’d use: Does our AI make the customer feel supported, without quietly steering them away from reality, consent, or good next steps? If the bot flatters, agrees, or reassures when it should clarify, slow down, or hand off, you do not have “better empathy.” You have drift.
In 2026, the most practical CX discipline will be designing for emotional steadiness: clear boundaries, safe language in tense moments, and a fast path to a human when the conversation turns fragile.
See you tomorrow.
👥 Share This Issue
If this issue sharpened your thinking about AI in CX, share it with a colleague in customer service, digital operations, or transformation. Alignment builds advantage.
📬 Feedback & Ideas
What’s the biggest AI friction point inside your CX organization right now? Reply in one sentence — I’ll pull real-world examples into future issues.