If Your AI Business Case Is “Fewer Agents,” Read This Twice
Plus: Gartner’s cost warning, Cisco’s privacy reality check, and Airtable’s agent move
📅 January 28, 2026 | ⏱️ 4-min read
Good Morning!
The Executive Hook:
Most of us have seen this movie: a shiny automation pitch walks into the boardroom and says, “We’ll cut service costs.” Everyone nods. Someone updates a spreadsheet. Then reality shows up with invoices, infrastructure, escalation volume, and customers who really, really want a human when it matters.
That’s the tension in today’s issue. GenAI can absolutely improve service. But the path to value looks less like headcount reduction and more like better resolution, fewer repeat contacts, and tighter handoffs. In other words, it’s a CX product now. Treat it like one, or it will treat your budget like a suggestion.
🧠 THE DEEP DIVE: GenAI Resolutions Could Cost More Than Offshore Support
The Big Picture: Gartner says the cost per resolution for GenAI in customer service is on track to surpass many offshore human agent costs—meaning “AI will save us money” needs a little… humility.
What’s happening:
GenAI cost per resolution is projected to exceed $3 by 2030. Infrastructure costs, vendor pricing, and more complex workflows add up fast.
Regulation may push more people to demand a human. Gartner predicts AI-related regulatory changes could raise assisted service volume by 30% by 2028 as customers opt out of AI.
Some big companies will spend more, not less. Gartner predicts 10% of Fortune 500 firms will double customer service spending to use AI for hyper-personalized, proactive experiences.
Why it matters:
If your plan is “bots = fewer agents,” you need to pressure-test it now. If customers can bypass AI more easily (and regulators encourage it), your staffing model has to survive higher human demand—not lower. The smarter play is using AI to reduce repeat contacts, tighten handoffs, and give humans better context so problems actually get solved the first time.
The takeaway:
Measure AI like a CX product: resolution quality, fewer repeat contacts, retention lift, and trust—not just deflection and handle time.
Source: Gartner
📊 CX BY THE NUMBERS: Privacy is Becoming The New CX Infrastructure
Data Source: Cisco 2026 Data and Privacy Benchmark Study
85% say data localization adds cost, complexity, and risk to cross-border service delivery.
Only 12% say their AI governance structures are mature and proactive.
46% say the most effective trust-builder is clear communication about how data is collected and used.
The Insight:
Customers don’t experience your “AI roadmap.” They experience your data behavior. If your AI feels creepy, inconsistent, or off-brand, it’s often not the model—it’s sloppy data practices and fuzzy rules. Privacy, transparency, and governance aren’t legal checkboxes anymore. They’re CX fundamentals.
More: Cisco
🧰 THE AI TOOLBOX: Airtable Superagent
The Tool: Airtable launched Superagent, its move into the “multi-agent” world—where multiple specialist agents work in parallel, instead of one chatbot doing everything serially (and occasionally making stuff up with confidence).
What it does:
It plans the work, delegates to multiple agents, and returns a structured deliverable—more “useful output,” less “chat transcript you have to babysit.”
CX Use Case:
Turn VOC into action: cluster feedback, spot themes, propose fixes, and generate a weekly “what changed + what to do next” brief.
Build escalation packs: timeline, prior contacts, policy references, and resolution options—so managers start at 80% instead of zero.
Trust:
The headline isn’t “agents.” It’s consistency. If AI touches customers, your brand needs repeatable quality—plus easy human review—so tone and decisions don’t depend on who’s on shift.
More: TechCrunch
⚡ SPEED ROUND: Quick Hits
Aon + DataRobot are exploring agentic AI to speed up client onboarding and servicing (docs consolidation, certificate generation, invoicing, ID cards)—with humans explicitly “in the loop.”
Fujitsu launched a “sovereign” enterprise platform for managing the full GenAI lifecycle in dedicated environments, emphasizing guardrails, vulnerability scanning, and low-code agent building.
NTT DATA’s 2026 Technology Foresight Report puts a flag in the ground: “human-orchestrated autonomy” and emotionally responsive systems are moving from concept to strategy.
📡 THE SIGNAL: Trust is the real cost driver now
Service leaders used to optimize for speed and volume. Now the job is speed with judgment. Because AI can scale help, but it can also scale confusion, tone-deaf answers, and expensive clean-up work.
Today’s thread is simple: the economics of automation are getting messier. Infrastructure and workflow complexity add cost. Regulation and opt-out pressure can push more customers to humans. And weak governance makes every mistake feel like a brand decision, even when it was really a process decision.
So the question is not “How fast can we deflect contacts?” It’s “How reliably can we resolve them?” If AI helps humans start at 80% instead of zero, reduces repeat contacts, and keeps data behavior honest and consistent, you get value. If it mainly creates more escalations and more second-guessing, you just bought a fancier way to be busy.
See you tomorrow,
👥 Share This Issue
If this issue sharpened your thinking about AI in CX, share it with a colleague in customer service, digital operations, or transformation. Alignment builds advantage.
📬 Feedback & Ideas
What’s the biggest AI friction point inside your CX organization right now? Reply in one sentence — I’ll pull real-world examples into future issues.