Your Customers Don’t Want “AI.” They Want You to Remember Them.
Plus: The fastest way to break trust is to automate confusion
To opt-out of receiving DCX AI Today go here and select Decoding Customer Experience in your subscriptions list.
📅 February 9, 2026 | ⏱️ 4-min read
Good Morning!
Quick story.
A customer calls. They’re not furious. Not yet. But you can hear it in their breathing. This is the third time they’ve explained the same issue. Same details. Same “one moment while I pull that up.” Same sense that your company has the memory of a goldfish.
Now imagine the next agent picks up and says, “Yep, I see what happened last time. Here’s what we’re doing next.”
That’s the experience. That’s the bar.
The Executive Hook:
Everyone’s chasing AI that “handles more.” Cool. But the first job for AI in service is way less glamorous: stop making customers repeat themselves. If your AI can’t improve continuity, it’s just faster chaos with better grammar.
🧠 THE DEEP DIVE: Barclays Is Using GenAI for Call Summaries (Quietly a Big Deal)
The Big Picture: Barclays US Consumer Bank says it’s using generative AI to create structured summaries of customer service calls so agents get context faster and can move the issue forward.
What’s happening:
Summaries capture the basics that usually get lost (why they called, what happened, what’s next).
It’s built for the humans doing the work, not as a flashy customer-facing stunt.
It standardizes “good notes,” so continuity doesn’t depend on which agent handled the last interaction.
Why it matters:
Most service failures are not empathy failures. They’re continuity failures. Customers don’t hate problems. They hate déjà vu.
Call summaries are one of the cleanest ways to reduce effort without messing with brand tone. It makes every interaction leave breadcrumbs the next person can actually use.
The takeaway:
Make continuity measurable. Track how often customers repeat themselves. Track how often agents start cold. Then aim your AI budget at the biggest repeat loops first.
Source: Barclays
📊 CX BY THE NUMBERS: The “AI Will Replace Agents” Story Is Already Bending Back
Data Source: Gartner
By 2027, 50% of companies that cut customer service staff due to AI will rehire for similar functions, under different titles. The work didn’t disappear. It just got relabeled.
Only 20% of customer service leaders said they’ve reduced agent staffing due to AI (survey referenced by Gartner). Translation: headlines move faster than operations.
The big risk is “short-term cost thinking.” Cut too deep, and you end up rehiring anyway, but now you’re rebuilding capability under pressure.
The Insight:
If your AI strategy is only a cost story, it eventually runs into the wall called “customers still need help.” The smarter play is capacity and quality: faster resolution, better continuity, fewer avoidable escalations.
🧰 THE AI TOOLBOX: Outdated Help Articles: The Quiet Way to Lose Customers
The Tool: Brainfish Auto-Updating Docs, which keeps your help articles accurate as your product changes, without your team rewriting everything by hand.
What it does:
It watches what users do in the product, what they search for, and where they get stuck. Then it updates support content so customers are less likely to hit outdated instructions.
CX Use Case:
Kill the “that button isn’t there anymore” problem: When your UI changes, your docs don’t stay frozen in last month’s reality.
Reduce repeat tickets: Fewer people ask the same question when the article actually matches the current product.
Trust:
Outdated docs are a trust killer. Customers try the steps, they fail, and now they assume your support is unreliable. Auto-updating content is less about “AI magic” and more about protecting credibility at the exact moment customers are looking for help.
Source: Brainfish
⚡ SPEED ROUND: Quick Hits
Anthropic’s funding round could raise more than $20B, Bloomberg reports — More cash means faster product releases from the vendors your execs already want to buy. Your job is being the adult in the room about readiness and risk.
Salesforce says multi-agent adoption will surge 67% by 2027 and 96% of IT leaders say integration is the make-or-break factor — Another reminder that “agentic” is mostly an integration project in disguise, and CX teams should get loud now about where customer truth lives (before agents start freelancing across six systems).
ElevenLabs raises $500M as voice AI keeps accelerating — Voice is back on the table, which matters because your highest-stakes moments still happen on the phone (billing panic, travel chaos, health stuff).
📡 THE SIGNAL: The Brand Is the Handoff
Customers don’t experience your AI. They experience what your AI causes. If it helps your teams remember and act with clarity, customers feel cared for. If it accelerates confusion, customers feel dismissed. The real competitive advantage right now is not the fanciest model. It’s clean context, clean handoffs, and the discipline to keep humans in the loop where judgment matters. Automate the repeatable. Protect the sensitive. And never automate amnesia.
See you tomorrow,
👥 Share This Issue
If this issue sharpened your thinking about AI in CX, share it with a colleague in customer service, digital operations, or transformation. Alignment builds advantage.
📬 Feedback & Ideas
What’s the biggest AI friction point inside your CX organization right now? Reply in one sentence — I’ll pull real-world examples into future issues.